wildcard_47 (
wildcard_47) wrote2008-06-01 12:47 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Steven. Moffat.
You are a freaking genius.
AND I HATE YOU!! You and your damn cliffhangers!
Also, (for those of you who have just watched) answer me this. Why is the little girl a conduit to all the inner workings of the Library? Is she the universe's biggest hard-drive, camoflaged and hidden by someone who knows better (like her psychiatrist, Dr. Moon?) Is she the living Library -- the backup system for the millions of years of knowledge stored in those books?
Additionally, why does everyone's friendliest ER doc (aka, Professor River-Song) show up as an anthropologist, who has a TARDIS-shaped journal full of "spoilers" and a sonic SCREWDRIVER??? If she were simply a future companion, that link I could get. She knows the Future Doctor and she obviously knows the history of Donna (as her successor, maybe?) But, this woman has a SONIC DEVICE. And, as the Doctor himself says, he doesn't just give those out to anyone. Her sonic also looked, well, homemade. As if it had been constructed piecemeal rather than straight-from-the-factory. Why would the Doctor help her build -- or help her understand how to build -- a piece of Time Lordian technology if she's just a regular old human?
Plus (this sealed the deal for me) she is very familiar -- too familiar -- with the Doctor to be "just" another companion. She told Donna that having him look through her, without recognition, "killed her". Not hurt, not annoyed, but "killed". Not a word that's thrown around lightly. She also stroked his face. Stared into his eyes and said he "looked younger than she'd ever seen him". That observation seems fairly insignificant on the surface, yet to notice the imperceptible change of a person's eyes -- a change which runs deeper than the color, or the structure, but hinges on recognizing and understanding the emotions and age of the person behind the eyes -- means that she's been able to peer very closely at them -- at him -- before. Which could be very intimate, in any sense of the word.
Edit: I just realized that the Professor's sonic blaster might be the same make as Jack's was in TDD, Season 1. Both blasters are 51st century, presumably from the Villengard factory-turned-banana-grove. So, does this mean that Nine has not yet blown up that factory? Or, does it mean that the Professor has access to those types of weapons (through an organization like the Time Agency, or through her future association with the Doctor?)
Grr. I still hate Steven Moffat right now. Though he makes for brilliant two-part episodes, the man should not be allowed to write about mundane things. He makes them terrifying. Case in point, I am now more than a little suspicious of gas masks, statues of angels, and shadows.
P.S. In case you can't tell, when I start overanalyzing television into tiny bits (as in the above), that means I am officially an obsessed fan. Whee. :)
Additionally, why does everyone's friendliest ER doc (aka, Professor River-Song) show up as an anthropologist, who has a TARDIS-shaped journal full of "spoilers" and a sonic SCREWDRIVER??? If she were simply a future companion, that link I could get. She knows the Future Doctor and she obviously knows the history of Donna (as her successor, maybe?) But, this woman has a SONIC DEVICE. And, as the Doctor himself says, he doesn't just give those out to anyone. Her sonic also looked, well, homemade. As if it had been constructed piecemeal rather than straight-from-the-factory. Why would the Doctor help her build -- or help her understand how to build -- a piece of Time Lordian technology if she's just a regular old human?
Plus (this sealed the deal for me) she is very familiar -- too familiar -- with the Doctor to be "just" another companion. She told Donna that having him look through her, without recognition, "killed her". Not hurt, not annoyed, but "killed". Not a word that's thrown around lightly. She also stroked his face. Stared into his eyes and said he "looked younger than she'd ever seen him". That observation seems fairly insignificant on the surface, yet to notice the imperceptible change of a person's eyes -- a change which runs deeper than the color, or the structure, but hinges on recognizing and understanding the emotions and age of the person behind the eyes -- means that she's been able to peer very closely at them -- at him -- before. Which could be very intimate, in any sense of the word.
Edit: I just realized that the Professor's sonic blaster might be the same make as Jack's was in TDD, Season 1. Both blasters are 51st century, presumably from the Villengard factory-turned-banana-grove. So, does this mean that Nine has not yet blown up that factory? Or, does it mean that the Professor has access to those types of weapons (through an organization like the Time Agency, or through her future association with the Doctor?)
Grr. I still hate Steven Moffat right now. Though he makes for brilliant two-part episodes, the man should not be allowed to write about mundane things. He makes them terrifying. Case in point, I am now more than a little suspicious of gas masks, statues of angels, and shadows.
P.S. In case you can't tell, when I start overanalyzing television into tiny bits (as in the above), that means I am officially an obsessed fan. Whee. :)
no subject
I don't think Donna's gone yet. (The node is too bizarre for a companion death, which Moffat of all people would know how to play for every once of drama.) And I know no companion gets to stay forever. (And didn't she just jinx herself a couple episodes back by saying she'd do just that? Sigh.) But I really, really don't want to see her go. So so much fun, so sharp and witty and yet also able to see right to the heart of this skinny, angsty alien. Beautiful combination. I can't imagine the writers wanting to give that up just yet! (And we need much more Wilf, too. Heh. Finally, a family member who APPROVES of the Doctor!)
Of course, I wouldn't have ditched Rose after just two seasons, either. And Eccleston would've been signed on a multi-season contract. So what do I know?
no subject
no subject
Heck, if you watch the trailer, alt!Donna is coming from Pete's Universe. Which will be very, very interesting...
no subject
no subject
She's in there twice. The first clip is quick flash about 2/3 of the way through. Ten leaps the barricade, we see a Dalek close-up, then there's a mechanical contraption with what looks like a rough-n-tumble version of Donna standing in front. Lights on either side flare. She's wearing a battered brown coat, purple turtleneck, jeans. Definitely the red hair is a bit of a giveaway. But I didn't believe it was her until the close-up -- which happens in the quick flashes of different images shortly thereafter. The flames in the TARDIS, Ten looking panicked, then Donna again - same red hair, differently styled, same clothing as the first clip. Then Ten reaching out for something/someone and the cut to Rose's "It's only just beginning."
no subject
no subject
I just heard a radio interview with Tennant in which he was asked "Has Catherine Tate signed for another season?" He dodged the question neatly by saying that "Donna has quite a story arc during the remaining episodes of this season." (paraphrased)
*needs more Donna icons*
no subject
no subject
*returns this regularly scheduled blog back over to
no subject
no subject
I'm interested in the whole alt! vs. regular!Donna conversation you've got going here. But, if River Song is actually not going to be a companion, I'd love for her to be the Doctor's biographer. That would be kind of fun.
the Master regnerated, Jenny regenerated, etc.
Hahahahaha.....oh, fandom. *giggles some more*